Weekends Behave Unlike Weekdays

Nothing stops on Saturday. The order books are live, prices move, and a range forms wherever you have decided the session begins. The temptation to treat these as ordinary sessions is obvious, particularly for anyone whose weekdays are occupied. The reason to resist it is that the market on a weekend is made up of different people doing different things, and a strategy calibrated on weekday behaviour is being applied to something it was not measured against.
Who Is Missing

Weekend order flow is thinner and differently composed. Desks that operate on business hours are largely absent, and much of the flow tied to traditional markets has nowhere to originate because those markets are shut. What remains is mostly retail and whatever automated activity runs continuously, and the balance between them shifts substantially from a Tuesday afternoon.
The consequence is not simply less volume. It is that the participants who normally absorb a large order are fewer, so the same size moves price further, and the same news lands harder. Depth and activity are related but they are not the same thing, and it is the depth that matters for how a level behaves.
What Thin Books Do to a Range

A range formed in a thin book has edges that were established by less conviction than the equivalent weekday range. Fewer participants tested them and fewer defended them, so the level is a weaker statement about where interest sits even when the numbers look perfectly normal on a chart.
Range height also stops being comparable. Some weekends are unusually quiet, producing compressed ranges that any small move can break. Others produce outsized ranges from a single order arriving into an empty book. Both distort the comparison against a typical session, and if you are using recent range height to judge whether today is normal, weekend sessions are contaminating that reference.
Breaks Behave Differently
A weekend break can run further than it should on very little, because there is nothing in the way. It can also fail more readily, because the move was one participant rather than a shift in opinion and there is nobody following. Which of these happens is harder to anticipate than on a weekday, and that unpredictability is itself the finding.
There is a further wrinkle around the handover into Monday. Positioning that built through a quiet weekend frequently gets repriced when weekday participants return, and a weekend move that looked established can be undone quickly. A position held into that transition faces a risk that has nothing to do with the range it was based on.
The Case Each Way
Sitting weekends out is the simpler choice and the easier one to defend. It keeps the sample clean, it keeps the range height reference honest, and it costs only the sessions you were least equipped to read. For anyone still establishing whether the approach works at all, this is probably the right call, because mixing two regimes into one record makes the record hard to interpret.
Trading them separately is the more interesting option. Weekends are a distinct regime rather than a degraded version of a weekday, and treating them as their own thing, with their own range height reference and their own record, is a legitimate approach. What does not work is the middle position of trading them under weekday rules and hoping the differences average out.
Deciding in Advance
Whichever way you go, the decision should be made before Saturday rather than on it. A quiet weekend with no obvious setup is exactly when the rule gets tested, and a rule about weekends made on a weekend is being made by someone who has already looked at the chart.
Keeping the two records separate is worth the small extra effort regardless. Even if you trade both, knowing how your weekend sessions performed as a group tells you something that a combined figure never will, and it makes the question of whether to keep trading them answerable with evidence rather than with preference.